:SITE-MAP
   :September ~9, ~2010

:Communication
-Methods

The Law & Terms
   Educational Claim
   Oath In the Truth
   Perpetual Claim of
the Court

   Complaint Filing
Through the Postal
Service

   Traps Filing
Complaints

   Motion vs. Complaint
   Foreign State
   For the Justice
   For the Rape
   Sovereign vs.
Fiction

   Chart of the
Violations


Religion & English
by the Math

Contract-States-Clai
ms

Documents
Sentence Structure
Quantum Dictionary
Quantum Thesaurus
australia-facebook
August-Seminar~10
July-August-Australi
a-seminar

Languages
The
C.S.S.C.S.L.-Flag

DVD& BOOK-ORDER
SECRETS
OVERVIEW
Lowel [Lary] Becraf
SCAMS
BANKING-TREATY
SEE-TREATY
POSTMASTER-TREATY
SAVING-CLAUSE-CLAIM-
TREATY

:TITLE~18-CSCS~1001
:gold-certificate
:QUANTUM-DAMAGES
HAWAII~23~MAR~09
HAWAII~27~FEB~2009
HAWAII-DVD-2009
SYNTAX
Hawaii-Constitution
Mauri-Constitution
U.-N.-CONSTITUTION-S
YNTAX

AUGUST-28-SEMINAR-20
10

book-&-DVD
PLAGIRIZE
Global-Faith


:HOME   :ORDER   :SEMINARS   :MEDIA   :FLAGS   
  For the Justice

FOR THE JUSTICE IS WITH THE OUTLAW

~1. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE WITH THE JUSTICE IN THE COURTS ---HOWEVER?

~2. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE WITH THE FACTS OF THE JUSTICE FOR THE VACATION OF THE TRUTH AND FACT(NOUN) IN THE TRUTH(NOUN).

~3. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE WITH THE UNDERSTANDING BY THE MEANING OF THE WORD : 'JUSTICE' IS WITH THE MEANING: OUTSIDE OF THE LAW FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE PEOPLE AND FOR THE FICTION OF THE BLACK-ROBES [FOR THE MORNING OF THE JUSTICE].

~4. FOR THE PEOPLE WITH THE KNOWLEDGE ARE FOR THE STUDY OF THE PREFIX OF THE WORD: 'JU': JUST, JUSTICE, JUDGE, JUDGEMENT, JUDICIAL, JUDICIALLY, JUDICATORY, JUDICATIVE, JUDICIOUS(LY), JURY, JURATORY, JURIDICIAL(LY), JURISCONSULT, JURISDICTION, JURISDICTIONAL, JURISPRUDENCE, JURISPRUDENT, JURIST, JUROR,

SHALL NOT THE JUDGE OF ALL THE EARTH DO RIGHT:

GEN. 17 * (DPV = DANGLING-PARTICIPIAL-VERB) 1.6 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 DPV2 = (1 * ADVERB)(2 * VERB) (6 * FUTURE-TENSE)

FOR ALL THINGS IN THE PRESENT-TENSE ARE WITH THE JURISDICTION OF THE COURT BY THE CONTRACT. FOR THE CORPORATION OF THE PLEADING IS WITH THE FREE-WILL OF THE PETITIONER.

FOR THE FOREMAN OF THE JURY IS FOR THE JUDGEMENT OF THE LAW AND OF THE FACTS.

8 9 4 8 9 4 2 8 9 4 8 9 4 8 9 4 0 8 9 4

(8*PREPOSITION)(9*ARTICLE)(4*NOUN)(2*VERB) [WEBSTER(1828)]

FOR THE NUMBER-CODES WITH THE WORDS ARE FOR THE SPACE-SAVING OF THE PROCEDURAL-IDENTIFICATION-TRANSLATION OF THE WORD:

~1 = ADVERB * (MODIFIER OF THE VERB, ADVERB, ADJECTIVE) FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE NOUN OR FACT IS WITH THE CHANGE OF THE CONDITION OF THE FACT BY THE PREJUDICE.

~2 = VERB (FOR THE MOTION OF THE THINKING)(WILL OF THE INTENT)IS/ARE

~3 = ADJECTIVE (MODIFIER OF THE NOUN COLOR OF THE THINKING)

~4 = PRONOUN (PRESUMPTION, ASSUMPTION, OPINION OF THE FACT OR NOUN)

~5 = PREPOSITION (FOR THE ASSIGNMENT OF THE AUTHORITY WITH THE ARTICLE)

~6 = ARTICLE (FOR THE COMMAND OF THE NOUN)

~7 = NOUN (FACT)

~8 = PAST-TENSE-TIME (LACKS-JURISDICTION, LACKS-INJURY IN THE PRESENT-TENSE)

~9 = FUTURE-TENS-TIME (PRESUMPTION, OPINION, ASSUMPTION, FUTURE-DID-NOT-HAPPEN)

~0 = CONJUNCTION AND, OR, (NEUTRAL-WORD, EITHER-OR, BETWEEN THE NOUNS OR FACTS)

FOR THE NUMBERS WITH THE WORDS ARE FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE EMOTIONAL-INFLUENCE OF THE SUBJECT-MATTER-PICTURES WITH THE MIND.

2 + 2 = 4, TOO + TO = FOR, 22 WAYS FOR THIS SOUND, AFFIRMATION-EQUALS-TRUTH
4 + 4 = 8, FOR + FOUR = ATE 12 WAYS FOR THIS SOUND
3 + 3 = 6, THREE PLUS THREE EQUALS FROM SIX: 'FROM' IS IN THE PAST-TENSE AND AS AN ADVERB MODIFYING THE (6)SIX AS A VERB. FOR THE SIX IS WITH THE MODIFICATION AS THE VERB.

HOW, DOES THE 6, BECOME A VERB? FOR THE 6, AS THE NOUN IS AGAINST THE MODIFICATION

5 6 7 5 6 7 5 6 7 5 6 7 4 2 5 6 7

OF THE FACT. FOR THE FACT-IS-FACT AND MUST-STAND ON THE FACT.

5 6 7 5 6 7-7-7 0 7-7 5 6 7

FOR THE 6 CAN-NOT-BE FOR THE ADJECTIVE, FOR NO WORD IS WITH THE FOLLOWING FOR THE MODIFICATION OF THE 6.

SAME RULE WITH THE 6 AS AN ADVERB AGAINST THE MODIFICATION. FOR THE VERB IS WITH THE ACT OF THE ACTION OF THE THINKING AGAINST THE MODIFICATION.

FOR THIS PAPER IS FOR AN EXAMPLE FOR THE CAUSE OF THE PLEADINGS BY THESE PETITIONER WITH THE TRUTH IN THE DOCUMENTS WITH THIS CASE. FOR THIS CASE IS IN THE GOOD-FAITH FOR THE EDUCATIONAL-UNDERSTANDING OF THE LANGUAGE AND HOW IT EFFECTS WITH THE TRUTH OF THE FACTS OF THIS CASE.

:PAGE-TOP

:COPYCLAIMS/COPYRIGHTS-~JANUARY-~1980 THROUGH-~OCTOBER-~2010

BY THE PLENIPOTENTIARY-JUDGE :David-Wynn: Miller.

FOR THE CORRECT-SENTENCE-STRUCTURE-COMMUNICATION-SYNTAX-LANGUAGE(C.-S.-S.-C.-S.-L.) OF THESE CONTRACT-STATES-CORPORATION-VESSEL. FOR THE CONTRACT-STATES OF THE TWO OR MORE-PERSONS IN THE CLOSED-AREA OF THE CONTRACT-VESSEL-COURT ARE WITH THE CLAIM OF THE TERMS WITHIN THE CONTRACT-STATES-POSTAL-SERVICE-DI-STRICT-COURT OF AN ORIGINAL-JURISDICTION. DI=ORIGINAL, STRICT=JURISDICTION-VENUE

:JUDGE :DAVID-WYNN :MILLER. ~5166 :N. ~63RD. -ST. :MILWAUKEE, :WISCONSIN ~53218
:PHONE: (414) 466-3584 :CELL: (414) 803-5448 :E-MAIL:
dwmlawpro@aol.com